Marci Rae Beagley, center, and her husband, Jeffrey Dean Beagley, behind left, walk into the Clackamas County Courthouse courtroom of Judge Susie L. Norby for their arraignment. Photo by Randy L. Rasmussen/The OregonianAn Oregon couple was convicted on criminally negligent homicide…..
The Oregon couple are believers in faith healing. So, when their 16 year old son developed a urinary tract infection they had prayed instead of taking their son to the doctors for modern medicine to take care of the problem. The son had a complication, he was suffering from a serious kidney disease resulting from a constriction in his bladder that was present at birth. A catheter could have saved his life. An a side note they previously had lost their granddaughter due to pneumonia and a blood infection because their granddaughters parents had believed the same way
Here is the link to that article….
http://www.wftv.com/family/22421602/detail.htmlI am kind of split on this situation
On one hand…..
It is sad that the child had died from something that would have been preventable if only he would have be able to receive medical treatment. I mean I am sure the parents did not mean to kill their son but with the loss of their granddaughter you would have thought that they would have at least possibly reconsidered their stand on no modern medicine. A loss of a child is something that most of us want to prevent.
On the other hand….
It is their religious beliefs. I may not agree with the way they do things. I mean if my children get sick, I’ll take them to the doctor. If they get really sick I would go to the hospital and for me prayer would be all part of the process It is just one of those situations where I feel if they start to ban and make laws against some religious beliefs, I don’t think it will be long till my religious beliefs will be infringed on.
Today its faith healing, tomorrow it will be your right to deny flu shots or certain vaccinations or it will be the rights of you to decide that treatment option best for your child.
I mean I know plenty of people who don’t vaccinate or refuse blood transfusions because of religious beliefs. And they are good people, they just believe different things than I do. I would hate to see that their child die and they get charged with criminally negligent homicide all because if they went against their beliefs they might have been viewed as been able to save them. Especially because I know they would not intend for their child die but they wanted to honor the ways of the god and belief system they believe in.
All in all I think it may be a slippery slope that they went down when they charged these parents…a well intentioned slippery slope but a slippery slope none the less. But when it comes to whether this decision is for the best….my verdict is still out….Saving a life is precious …..the freedom of religion is priceless…and finding a balance is the great divide.
I guess someday we will find that balance…
The real question here is how far is too far? How far does a religion go till it becomes a crime?
What are your thoughts?
Should the parents be charged?